Why Direct Game Totally Sucks

Mon, 02/03/2015

I know tons of students are in love with the idea of
direct game.

The come to my workshops and try it. I am open-minded so
I let them try it and I observe.

It flops every time.

When I say “flops” I mean that one of two things

One: It gets a blowout and the girl looks like “oh wow,
this is making me uncomfortable to get an unwarranted
compliment out of nowhere from a needy guy”.

Two: The girl gets a big smile, her ego goes to cloud
nine, then she does the “politely give this guy a
chance” thing for a couple of minutes, then she decides
to leave because it’s boring and there’s no challenge.

I always give the student about 5 tries because I don’t
want to piss on anyone’s parade.

After they flop 5 times I give them one of the openers
from my Black Book Method and it works way better.

The girls start talking to them, show attraction, and
they get better results.

I’m not against the idea of direct game, or the theory,
or anything else.

I’m not trying to bash anyone or start any political

I’m open to anything that works.

It’s been proven to me over and over that it doesn’t
work like my Black Book Method openers.

I just want people to use the stuff that has been proven
to get guys laid.

But there’s lot’s of dating material out there that
caters to people’s small comfort zones by giving them
nice-guy stuff or direct game.

They want to continue to cling to old fashion BS dating
advice like “just tell her you like her and ask her out.
Be confident.” – The kind of stuff your grandma tells

The guys who learn this stuff tend to become
approach-artists. That’s a guy who can open pretty well
but never gets laid.

They NEVER learn the mindset of a guy who is dominant.

They stay a pussy forever, because the material allows
them to stay a pussy.

The Black Book Method openers do more than
open, they teach you a mindset that will get you laid.

Direct openers do not teach this, they let you stay your
old chumpy self a lot longer.

Talk soon,

Brad P.